Business Law

Business Law

Business Law

Business Lawyers, attorneys, law firms, and bussiness law professionals.
Bill Price has been an Illinios lawyer for 33 years. Visit his website to find out how his experience can bring value to your business.
  • Bad Things Happen To Undocumented Business People

    If you don’t take care of those who depend on you, bad things (often involving lawyers) tend to happen: A promise is not a will:  Charles Kuralt, the TV commentator, lived with Patricia Elizabeth Shannon for 29 years, many on 90 acres of Montana land with a renovated schoolhouse and a view. He sent her… The post Bad Things Happen To Undocumented Business People appeared first on Growth Law. […]

  • Exit Plans Do Not Always Require A Sale

    Exit Plans Do Not Always Require A Sale So what else can you do besides selling? What constitutes a successful business exit? A few examples, which does not need to include selling everything to strangers as part of your plan: All in the family: The Tuttle family, of Dover, New Hampshire, kept a dairy operation… The post Exit Plans Do Not Always Require A Sale appeared first on Growth Law. […]

  • Historical Reasons For Companies Are Good Questions To Ask About Yours

    When Roman tenants stumbled back into the lobby of their apartment buildings after a night of drinking, they probably threw a few coins into a clay pot by the stairway. If they died of drink (or the lead lined pipes, or the diseases that city life still features), the coins in the pot would pay… The post Historical Reasons For Companies Are Good Questions To Ask About Yours appeared first on Growth Law. […]

  • ISBA LLC and S Corporation Tax Seminar Free Powerpoint

    Jim Nepple and I presented a half day seminar on LLC and S corporation tax issues on May 15, 2018. My part focused on what pass-through entities are, and how Illinois LLC operating agreements should be modified to define agency authority (e.g., who can sign contracts for the company) and manager rights, if the company… The post ISBA LLC and S Corporation Tax Seminar Free Powerpoint appeared first on Growth Law. […]

  • Illinois General Assembly Adds Harassment Liability And Training Mandates

    The Illinois General Assembly passed, and Governor Pritzker is expected to sign SB 75. This legislation: a. Increases information exchange between state departments concerning candidates for state licenses or those holding same whose licenses may be refused, revoked, or suspended as a result of commission of a civil rights violation. b. Specifies that a “hostile… The post Illinois General Assembly Adds Harassment Liability And Training Mandates appeared first on Growth Law. […]

  • Illinois General Assembly Repealed The Franchise Tax

    The General Assembly repealed the 1/10 of 1% capital assets of business corporations franchise tax, and the Governor has signed the repeal, P.A. 101-0009. The tax disappears for amounts due below $30 in 2020, below $1,000 in 2021, $10,000 in 2022, $100,000 in 2023, and all amounts in 2024. The tax comes back in 2026… The post Illinois General Assembly Repealed The Franchise Tax appeared first on Growth Law. […]

  • New Illinois Bar Video On Buying And Selling A Business

    The Illinois State Bar Association just posted a video with me talking about the documents you need to negotiate in the course of buying or selling a business, from the initial nondisclosure/noncircumvent that allows buyers and sellers to exchange confidential information to the term sheet which outlines their deal to the final sales contract (with… The post New Illinois Bar Video On Buying And Selling A Business appeared first on Growth Law. […]

  • Selling Your Business (Without Losing Your Shirt)

    Many Americans own a side business, or make most of their money from a company they help run. Very few of them get the money they deserve after building the business, because they either leave feet first in a health emergency, or fail to sell the place on terms that let them keep busy, get… The post Selling Your Business (Without Losing Your Shirt) appeared first on Growth Law. […]

  • Should You Avoid Probate?

      A lot of lawyers sell four or five thousand dollar will and trust packages that might avoid probate court processes for clients who would be better off with a court looking over their child or other adviser’s shoulder to make sure estate administration is prompt and fair. Illinois law now allows transfer by affidavit,… The post Should You Avoid Probate? appeared first on Growth Law. […]

  • The Case of The Dead Garden Store Owner

    Just posted a video to Youtube on what could happen if you die before a business deal like the sale of your business closes, with suggestions for how to document who has authority to act for your business or estate if something happens. The post The Case of The Dead Garden Store Owner appeared first on Growth Law. […]

Trade IN EU is an independent India-EU consulting firm to help your company to develop a sustainable logistics schema and to recognize tangible eco-efficient supply chain measures.
Katz, Marshall & Banks is a law firm in Washington, D.C. that specializes in employment and harassment law, whistleblower claims and whistleblower representations on behalf employees, civil rights and consumer class actions.
  • UMW President Denies School’s Failure to Protect Students from App Threats

    In a letter University of Mary Washington President Richard V. Hurley made public this week, UMW continues to deny allegations that the university failed to protect students from threats leveled against members of a campus feminist group. Instead, Hurley lambasted Feminists United members for publicly voicing their concerns that the university failed to respond to their reports that they were being threatened with physical violence based on their gender. He blamed members of Feminists United for initiating “a highly-publicized media campaign with unsubstantiated claims and misinformation.” In an unavailing effort to rebut their claims, President Hurley insisted that the university had met the Yik-Yak threats “head-on,” by consulting with legal counsel on possible actions to limit Yik-Yak’s presence on campus and by providing security for one member of FUC for one evening. Members of Feminist United and their lawyer, Debra Katz, disagree. “I find it disconcerting that President Hurley seems not to understand the university’s obligation…to provide a campus that is free of threats via anonymous posts,” said Katz in response to Hurley’s recent letter. According to Katz, the manner in which President Hurley chose to disseminate what was captioned as a private letter to Eleanor Smeal suggests that his real motivation was to retaliate against his critics by disparaging their motivations and actions to the entire University community and the media. […]

  • The Senate 'Makes Good' On Congress' Antitrust Promises

    Katz, Marshall & Banks partners Debra S. Katz and David J. Marshall published an article in Law360 on August 6, 2015, entitled “The Senate ‘Makes Good’ on Congress’ Antitrust Promises.”  This article discusses the Senate’s passage of the Criminal Antitrust Anti-Retaliation Act, a proposed amendment to the Antitrust Criminal Penalty Enhancement and Reform Act.  Following a 2011 recommendation from the U.S. Government Accountability Office, the Criminal Antitrust Anti-Retaliation Act would ensure that innocent parties suspicious of antitrust wrongdoing would be protected from retaliation, whether they report the suspicion internally or to the Department of Labor.  The bi-partisan amendment, sponsored by Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and co-sponsored by Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt), allows those retaliated against for engaging in protected activity to seek redress for retaliation such as discrimination, termination, demotion, suspension, and harassment.  Modeled on the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the amendment would also allow for a “kick-out” provision to file in federal court if the secretary of labor fails to issue a decision within 180 days of filing.  As this proposed Act simply renders existing antitrust policies more tenable, approval from the House would bode well for potential whistleblowers as well as all concerned with antitrust violations.  According to Debra S. Katz, one of the article’s authors, “The next step is to open the way to even more effective enlistment of insiders by offering financial incentives to those who come forward and assist in enforcement of antitrust laws.  The SEC whistleblower program has been tremendously effective in encouraging individuals to report violations of securities laws.  The same types of financial incentives should be offered to insiders who report anti-trust violations to appropriate governmental authorities and regulators.&rdquo […]

  • SOX Whistleblower Scores Victory Before the Fifth Circuit

    On July 31, 2015, a three-judge panel with the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit partially reversed a lower court’s decision dismissing a retaliation claim filed under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SOX”) against Tesoro Corporation, a petroleum products refiner and marketer. Kevin Wallace, a former vice president of Tesoro, filed a SOX complaint with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) of the Department of Labor alleging that the Company engaged in unlawful activity with respect to its accounting practices, booking taxes as revenues on certain financial forms, including the company’s Forms 10-K and 10-Q filings.  Wallace alleged that this accounting practice caused some areas of the company to appear more profitable than they in fact were.  Wallace also alleged that the company engaged in other unlawful activity, including violations of antitrust laws and wire fraud by providing some customers advance notice of price changes and by giving after-the-fact discounts to certain customers. Wallace alleged that he began investigating and making internal reports about possible SOX violations when he noted a seeming disparity between the company’s cash performance and its financial prognostications, leading him to discover the tax-as-revenue distortion.  He alleged that he was terminated in March 2010, in retaliation for this protected activity.  After OSHA dismissed the complaint, but before the Department of Labor’s Administrative Review Board issued a decision within 180 days of his filing of the case, Wallace availed himself of SOX’s “kick out” provision and filed suit in the United Stated District Court for the Western District of Texas. In dismissing the Complaint for failure to state a claim, the district court held that his complaints were “outside the scope of the OSHA complaint or any investigation it would reasonably prompt.”  In reversing the District Court’s decision, the Fifth Circuit concluded that the issue Wallace raised -- about the tax-as-revenue distortion -- constituted protected activity under SOX.  The Appeals court also held that the District Court had committed legal error in finding that Wallace had not pled an objectively reasonable belief of a SOX violation.  Rejecting Tesoro’s argument that Wallace could not have reasonably believed that the booking of taxes as revenue was fraud or violated SEC rules, the Court of Appeals concluded that Wallace had plausibly alleged that he reasonably believed his investigation and reporting of tax-accounting practices were not properly disclosed on the SEC forms. With the trial court’s decision reversed, Wallace may now continue his attempt to seek redress for his retaliation claim against Tesoro. […]

  • SEC Pushes for Amicus Brief to Clarify Dodd-Frank Internal Whistleblower Protection

    In an unusual request to a trial court, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission moved a California federal court on August 7th, 2015, to allow the commission to file an amicus brief on behalf of Sanford Wadler, previously in-house counsel for Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., who is suing his former employer for retaliation in violation of the Dodd-Frank Act.  Wadler alleges he was fired for reporting suspicion of foreign bribery to Bio-Rad.  In the proposed amicus brief, the SEC  would ask the court to adopt its position that the Dodd-Frank Act’s whistleblower protections extend to internal reporting, and not just to employees who report suspected securities violations (including foreign bribes) to the SEC. The SEC’s move in the Wadler case follows its issuance of an interpretive guidance on August 4, 2015, which made clear the commission’s position on the protection of internal reporting.  Noting that the relevant provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act are ambiguous, the SEC has filed amicus briefs in a number of federal appeals courts arguing that the ambiguity can be resolved consistent with Congressional intent only by granting protection to internal whistleblowers.  Most courts have agreed, but several others, most notably the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in the Asadi case, have held that the Dodd-Frank protections cover only those employees who actually report to the SEC and not those who report to their employers. The California federal court’s ruling on this question will likely determine whether Wadler’s case against Bio-Rad can proceed.  In 2014, the company paid $55 million to settle the federal government’s allegations that it had violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, and it was in part this record that led Wadler to investigate what he suspected were other such violations.  After Bio-Rad terminated his employment, Wadler filed suit in May 2015, claiming Bio-Rad had fired him for reporting internally that the company was bribing Chinese officials.   Bio-Rad has filed a motion to dismiss Wadler’s case on the grounds that the Dodd-Frank Act protects only employees who report their concerns to the SEC, which Wadler did not.  The SEC hopes that its amicus brief and its analysis of the statutory language aid the court in understanding that Bio-Rad’s (and the Fifth Circuit’s) interpretation of the law makes no sense, as it would undermine the emphasis on encouraging the internal reporting that is a cornerstone of the SEC Whistleblower Program that and the related protections for employees. In last week’s interpretive guidance and in its bid to influence the outcome of a motion to dismiss pending in a federal trial court, the SEC continues to stand up for the rights of employee-whistleblowers.  “The determination that the SEC is showing on this issues gives the commission a lot of credibility in the eyes of would-be whistleblowers,” said KMB partner David J. Marshall, who specializes in the representation of individuals before the SEC Whistleblower Program.  “The law remains unsettled, but knowing that the SEC supports them in the workplace can be a very encouraging factor in the decision of an employee to oppose their employer’s violations of U.S. securities laws.  Making sure these insiders are free to speak their minds to the boss is an important protection for the investing public, and is crucial to corporate accountability.&rdquo […]

  • OSHA Orders Reinstatement and Financial Compensation of Train Conductor Following Whistleblower Retaliation

    A recent federal investigation found that Burlington Northern Santa Fe, North America’s second-largest freight railroad, retaliated against a train conductor for reporting a knee injury. The rail operator has, as a result, been ordered to reinstate the employee and pay him $536,063 in back pay, damages, and attorney’s fees. The train conductor, injured en route from Vancouver to Pasco in November 2010, filed a Federal Railroad Safety Act anti-discrimination complaint with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) of the U.S. Department of Labor in February 2011. Following the injury report, BNSF filed disciplinary charges against the employee and subsequently terminated him. This was done despite knowledge that his injury report was protected by law. Following an investigation, OSHA determined that the rail operator had violated federal laws protecting whistleblowers. The agency ordered financial compensation and reinstatement, as well as the expungement of the employee’s record of all charges and disciplinary action following reinstatement. The rail company is now also required to conduct trainings for managers and supervisors on employee whistleblower rights and post a notice informing employees of their whistleblower rights. “Disciplining an employee for reporting an injury is illegal,” said the regional administrator for OSHA’s Seattle office, Ken Atha. “Those who do so face negative repercussions. Retaliatory actions can discourage other workers from speaking up, which may result in an unsafe work environment.” OSHA oversees the enforcement of the whistleblower provisions of the FRSA as well as 21 other statutes protecting whistleblowers who report violations of various laws. &nbs […]

  • Labor Department Finds Railroad Worker’s Reports of Workplace Threats Constituted Protected Activity Under FRSA

    Railroad whistleblowers received some encouraging news this summer following a decision by the Administrative Review Board (ARB) of the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) in the case of Leiva v. Union Pacific Railroad Co., Inc., ARB Nos. 14-016, -017, ALJ No. 2013-FRS-19 (ARB May 29, 2015).  The case involved allegations brought by Daniel Leiva, an engineer for Union Pacific Railroad in Texas.  At the conclusion of a trip in July 2012, Mr. Leiva was involved in a verbal altercation with a train conductor who yelled at Mr. Leiva using profanity and repeatedly pointed his finger at Mr. Leiva’s face.  Mr. Leiva felt intimidated and withdrew from the situation and reported the conductor’s actions.  These reports ultimately resulted in suspensions without pay for both employees.  Mr. Leiva’s supervisor conceded that had Mr. Leiva withdrawn his complaint, no such suspension would have been handed down.  Mr. Leiva filed a complaint with the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) alleging that his suspension constituted a violation of the Federal Railroad Safety Act (FRSA), which protects railroad workers from retaliation for reporting certain workplace safety issues.  OSHA dismissed Mr. Leiva’s claims, and he appealed to a DOL administrative law judge (ALJ).  The ALJ found that Union Pacific had violated the FRSA and ordered it to pay Mr. Leiva back pay, expenses, and other damages and to expunge all disciplinary references relating to Leiva’s suspension from his personnel record.  Union Pacific appealed to the ARB. The ARB upheld the ALJ’s ruling in favor of Mr. Leiva.  The ARB found that Mr. Leiva’s report of workplace violence constituted protected activity under FRSA for two reasons.  First, Mr. Leiva offered evidence demonstrating that he had been trained that: (a) workplace violence was a violation of Union Pacific rules; and (b) following Union Pacific rules would keep him compliant with federal regulations.  Mr. Leiva asserted that he therefore believed in good faith that the threatening behavior constituted a violation of the FRSA.  The ARB deferred to the ALJ’s determination that Mr. Leiva’s assertion was credible and, accordingly, found that his report of the threatening behavior constituted protected activity.  Second, the ARB upheld the ALJ’s determination that Mr. Leiva’s reporting constituted a report of a “hazardous safety or security condition” because: (a) Mr. Leiva felt threatened by the conductor; (b) Mr. Leiva was therefore unable to adequately communicate with the conductor; and (c) communication between an engineer and a conductor is essential to the safe operation of a train.  Accordingly, the threats created a hazardous safety or security condition, and the ARB found that Mr. Leiva’s reports of that hazardous safety condition were protected under the FRSA.&nbs […]

  • Katz, Marshall, & Banks, LLP Appoints New Partners

    Three attorneys from Katz, Marshall, and Banks, LLP were included in the June 15th Washington-area appointments and promotions. Alison Asarnow, Alexis Ronickher, and Matthew Stiff have been promoted to partner at Katz, Marshall, and Banks. […]

  • Jury Awards Railroad Whistleblower $1.25 Million

    A federal jury unanimously awarded $1.25 million to a railroad whistleblower, who was able to demonstrate that the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) had wrongfully terminated him after he filed a complaint regarding safety violations. BNSF locomotive engineer Michael Elliot found that overgrown vegetation was blocking the signal system along the BNSF-owned tracks between Tacoma and Vancouver, in addition to several other potentially disastrous signal malfunctions. According to the lawsuit, BNSF was slow to take corrective action. Consequently, in January 2011, after receiving no response, Elliot took his complaints to the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA). The FRA subsequently performed a six-week inspection, during which the agency found more than 375 violations, including one that resulted in a $1000 fine. Evidence presented at the trial demonstrates that BNSF officials made a concerted effort to set Elliot up for termination. One BNSF official, supervisor Dennis Kautzmann, was accused of planning a confrontation in the parking lot with Elliott. Kautzmann jumped onto the hood of Elliot’s car as Elliot was leaving, and an altercation ensued. According to court documents, this incident was used as a pretext to fire Elliot and have him charged with assault. A criminal court later dismissed the charges against Elliot. BNSF officials later claimed that, while this parking lot incident was under internal review, they discovered Elliot’s alleged failure to report his earlier felony conviction for driving under the influence and vehicle assault. Officials at BNSF used this pretext to terminate Elliot for a second time. Court documents, however, indicate that Elliott had informed them of this conviction and that BNSF supervisors intentionally provided the mediator with false information. As a result of the wrongful actions taken by the railroad company, Elliot was awarded $1 million in damages, including back pay, lost future pay, and $250,000 in punitive damages. Upon notice of this favorable outcome, Elliot was reportedly, and understandably, “ecstatic.&rdquo […]

  • Debra Katz Speaks in a ACI Panel Presentation on Whistleblower Law

    On July 28, 2015, Katz, Marshall, & Banks partner Debra S. Katz participated in a panel presentation, entitled “How to Handle Employment Landmines after a Whistleblower Complaint is Made and Validated: The Biggest Pitfalls that Can Heighten Exposure.”  The panel was part of the American Conference Institute’s Advanced Forum on Whistleblower Litigation, with a focus on responding to the increase in number of reports.  The presentation explicated who investigates such matters; the post-Menendez litigation hold notice; Upjohn warnings in light of recent SEC and NLRB developments; what to do if the whistleblower is in possession of confidential/privileged documents; management of the whistleblower’s administrative leave, compensation, promotions, and year-end evaluations; Voluntary Severance Agreements; and the termination of a whistleblower for misconduct. […]

  • Contact Us

    The best way to determine whether you have a legal claim is to have a lawyer with experience in such matters evaluate your situation. If you would like to discuss your legal matter with us, please complete the confidential form below or call our offices at (202) 299-1140. There is no fee associated with this intake process. What to expect when you contact KMB: You should receive a response from us within two business days of our receipt of your intake form. If you haven’t heard back from us within two business days, please contact us. Our intake attorney may ask you for additional information for review by a firm partner. We will then determine whether we are able to assist you and, if so, will schedule a time to meet with you or speak with you in greater detail. Name * Phone * Email Address * Employer Type of Industry City (Location where you work) State * Country Employer Size -Select-Small business < 50Mid-size business 51-1000Large business > 1000 Position and/or Title Years Working for Employer How Did You Find Our Firm? - None -Internet searchGoogle Sponsored Link advertisementNewspaper/magazineRecommended by a friend/relative/coworkerReferred by another attorneyThrough another website (Please specify)Other (Please specify) Specify Brief Description of Your Legal Issue * Accept Terms * I understand that the use of this confidential website form does not establish an attorney-client relationship prior to a client’s actual retention of the firm. We will treat all information you provide to us in a confidential manner. […]

Zamansky & Associates, one of the leading law firms specializing in securities fraud and financial services arbitration and litigation. We represent individual and institutional investors as well as brokerage industry employees who have been wrongfully terminated. Our securities law practice is nationally recognized for our unrivaled ability to aggressively prosecute cases and recover losses.
  • Cryptocurrency Lawyer Jake Zamansky Speaks to CNBC About the Possible Investigation of Riot Blockchain CEO

    Former Riot Blockchain CEO, John O’Rourke, may be included as part of a criminal investigation that has been launched by federal authorities in relation to “microcap fraud.” According to a CNBC article, the probe runs parallel with a civil case that the SEC brought against O’Rourke and others who were alleged to be part of … The post Cryptocurrency Lawyer Jake Zamansky Speaks to CNBC About the Possible Investigation of Riot Blockchain CEO appeared first on Zamansky LLC. […]

  • Is Your 529 Savings Plan a Target for Fraud?

    When you started saving for your children’s college tuition with a 529 savings plan, you probably did not give much thought to the risk of investment fraud. As a tax-advantaged investment tool that is sponsored by states across the country, you, like most people, probably assumed that the worst-case scenario would be not earning quite … The post Is Your 529 Savings Plan a Target for Fraud? appeared first on Zamansky LLC. […]

  • Riot Blockchain Announces “Material Weaknesses” in Financial Reporting Controls and Says It “May Never Become Profitable”

    Riot Blockchain, a publicly-traded Bitcoin and Litecoin mining company previously known as Bioptix, recently announced that its auditors had found “material weaknesses” in the company’s internal controls for financial reporting. The cryptocurrency company, which reported holding more than $41.6 million in cash at the end of 2017, also reported that it currently has just over … The post Riot Blockchain Announces “Material Weaknesses” in Financial Reporting Controls and Says It “May Never Become Profitable” appeared first on Zamansky LLC. […]

  • SEC Issues New Warnings Regarding Online Cryptocurrency Trading

    As cryptocurrency trading continues to grow in popularity among casual investors, and as new initial coin offerings (including fraudulent initial coin offerings) become increasingly common, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is warning investors to be wary of the risk of cryptocurrency scams. In a recent Investor Alert, the SEC discusses some of the more-recent … The post SEC Issues New Warnings Regarding Online Cryptocurrency Trading appeared first on Zamansky LLC. […]

  • Securities Attorney Jake Zamansky Gets Mentioned in Wealth Management Regarding Yield Enhancement Strategy (YES)

    The yield enhancement strategy (YES) is often pitched as a “safe” or “low-risk” option for investors who are interested in maintaining consistent returns. However, reality has recently shown that the investment products bought and sold under YES are extremely complex and risky. In recent months, many individual investors have come to realize that their iron … The post Securities Attorney Jake Zamansky Gets Mentioned in Wealth Management Regarding Yield Enhancement Strategy (YES) appeared first on Zamansky LLC. […]

  • Shareholder Lawsuits: Should You File a Direct Claim or a Derivative Claim?

    As a shareholder in a publicly-traded or privately-held corporation, your top priority should be protecting your investment. The value of your shares is directly related to the corporation’s profitability, and you need to feel confident that the people who are in control of the company (its officers, directors and majority shareholders) are acting with your … The post Shareholder Lawsuits: Should You File a Direct Claim or a Derivative Claim? appeared first on Zamansky LLC. […]

  • Sophisticated Investors Have Rights, Too!

    Summary So-called “Sophisticated” investors have won investment fraud cases. Investors recover losses where there has been investment fraud. Sophisticated investors have legal rights too.   There is a misconception among investors that if one is sophisticated, meaning a person with knowledge of financial matters like a business owner or a CPA, one cannot prevail in … The post Sophisticated Investors Have Rights, Too! appeared first on Zamansky LLC. […]

  • Surprise, You Own Chinese Bonds!

    Imagine your financial adviser selling you a bond fund that you thought was invested in low risk index or municipal securities only to find out that much of your holdings are in high-risk Chinese or Puerto Rico bonds. Unfortunately, that is the situation facing investors who may have unwittingly bought bond funds without realizing they … The post Surprise, You Own Chinese Bonds! appeared first on Zamansky LLC. […]

  • Wall Street’s Worst ‘Doublespeak’—The Yield Enhancement Strategy

    Wall Street is notorious for saying one thing to investors and meaning something else. It’s called “doublespeak,” language that deliberately obscures, disguises or distorts the meaning of words. The term was coined after the great British writer George Orwell used the term “doublethink” to describe a reality that was completely distorted, where down was up, … The post Wall Street’s Worst ‘Doublespeak’—The Yield Enhancement Strategy appeared first on Zamansky LLC. […]

  • Zamansky LLC attorney James Ostaszewski conducted an interview with the New York City Bar

    Zamansky LLC attorney James Ostaszewski, who also serves on the New York City Bar Association’s Task Force on Puerto Rico, recently conducted an interview with New York City Bar President Roger Juan Maldonado and New York State Bar President Michael Miller, regarding a report that the bar associations jointly issued regarding the impact of the … The post Zamansky LLC attorney James Ostaszewski conducted an interview with the New York City Bar appeared first on Zamansky LLC. […]

Affinity Law Firm efficiently handles your legal needs in business and real estate law. Our attorneys are experts in business legal cases. We serve Florida and Georgia. If you are looking for a qualified Jacksonville business lawer, contact Affinity Law Firm.
  • El Faro being investigated by Local Attorney

    How could this happen to the El Faro? Although I am a full-time attorney, I am also licensed by the US Coast Guard as a Captain. I don't pilot freighters but am very familiar with what it's like to be a captain. Currently, Adsum Law Firm has been requested by a family member to look… Read more The post El Faro being investigated by Local Attorney appeared first on Business Law, Litigation and Criminal Defense Attorneys. […]

  • Stopped for a DUI? What are my rights?

    I have had a few drinks and I see red lights behind me…What are my rights? First remain calm and pull over at the first safe location – a parking spot works well. If you are on the phone tell the person what is happening if you trust them and hang up immediately. Turn off… Read more The post Stopped for a DUI? What are my rights? appeared first on Business Law, Litigation and Criminal Defense Attorneys. […]

Stop collection harassment by debt collectors. CollectionStopper.com follows an effective process of handling debt collection issues that will result in the most optimum and satisfactory outcome for you. We have never lost a FDCPA trial.
Lemon law resource for consumers with defective automobiles, featuring lemon laws statutes for all fifty states and a directory of lemon law attorneys by state.
  • Lemon Law Statutes by State

    Click on your state below to research the consumer protection laws including the state lemon laws and federal warranty laws. If you need legal help, a link to a Lemon Law America affiliated attorney can be found near the top of the page. Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa […] The post Lemon Law Statutes by State appeared first on Lemon Law America. […]

  • Resources

    Miami, Florida Criminal Defense Attorney Miami, Florida based criminal defense lawyer and attorney firm offering criminal defense services in both State & Federal Court. The firms lawyers vigorously defend their clients throughout Miami, Fort Lauderdale & the greater South Florida with professional service at affordable rates. Personal Injury Attorney Law office of Gary Eto represents […] The post Resources appeared first on Lemon Law America. […]

  • Toyota Recalls over 6 million Vehicles

    Toyota will issue five separate recalls that affect over 6 million vehicles to correct problems in 27 Toyota models, including the RAV4, Corolla, Matrix, Viz, Yaris, Highlander, Tacoma and Camry. Faults were also found in the Pontiac Vibe and the Subaru Trezia which were manufactured by Toyota. The largest of the recalls will apply to […] The post Toyota Recalls over 6 million Vehicles appeared first on Lemon Law America. […]

  • US Lemon Law by States

    Lemon Law Lawyers Can Answer All Your Questions When you buy a car, truck, or other vehicle, you expect it to perform properly.. If it doesn’t, despite visits to the car dealer, you may have a lemon on your hands. When it comes to vehicles, a large number of people each year end up buying […] The post US Lemon Law by States appeared first on Lemon Law America. […]

  • Your Case Rating Score

    The post Your Case Rating Score appeared first on Lemon Law America. […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.